Drives for Globalisation

Drives for GlobalisationQ) Identify, define and get come in three of the drivers of the recent wave of sphericisation. Justify your selection, supporting your argument with the usance of examples.IntroductionGlobalisation canister be characterized by quadruplet factors the growing human beingswide interconnections, rapid, discontinuous change, cast upd number and diversity of participants, as come up as bygrowth complexity (Parker, 2005). According to the Dictionary of Economics (Bannock et al., 2003), the consideration globalisation, is defined as the geographical shifts in domestic activity roughly the world and away from the nation states. It can in any case be referred to the mutuality of economies, finished the change magnitude in cross-border movement of goods, service, technology and capital (Joshi, 2009). Examples of much(prenominal) integrations can be seen in the growing presence of galore(postnominal) supranational companies as they expand into raw( a) regions (i.e. McDonalds) and the go forthsourcing of manufacturing and services. There atomic number 18 four principal(prenominal) scene of actions that drive the recent wave of globalisation however, as separately argona is very broad, this essay give focus on three drivers inside the four categories.Drivers of GlobalisationThe four main areas of drivers for globalisation are market, regime equal and competition (see Figure 1). These external drivers affect the main conditions for the dominance of globalisation across industries, which are mainly uncontrollable by various(prenominal) firms. Market drivers include areas much(prenominal) as common customer inevitably and transferable marketing, whereby the emergence of global markets for standardized products has enabled corporations to cater demands in new markets with existing products (Levitt, 1983). Government influence is also a study driver, with policies lead-in to reductions in traffic barriers and a shift towards an centripetal market frugality. With rag to new markets and human capitals, in the area of appeal vantage drivers, companies are able to gain new economies of scale by selling at higher quantities, as well as explore the advantage of number 1 cost production through outsourcing and import. In the case of competitive drivers, the growing live on betwixt nations along with foreign direct investment (FDI) has helped to increase interdependence among countries and organisations, as well as exposing firms to new competitors.This essay get out now focus on three more specific drivers from these four areas the lowering of pile barriers in trade liberalization, the cost differences between countries, and the rapidly changing technology such as the internet. Globalisation is by no means a new phenomenon periods of growing interconnections had existed throughout history, such as the Silk Road connecting Europe to Asia. However, unlike many of ag unrivaled waves, globalisa tion straightaway represents much thicker relationships that involve many people and interactions in interconnected networks (Keohane and Nye, 2000). Hence, the priming for focusing on these three drivers is because they are virtually of the most primal factors that influence and steer the recent wave of globalisation. The governments trade policies help to open the door to their economy, while the difference in cost provides incentives for investment such as overseas companies looking to derive from low cost economies, at the same time, the rapidly changing technology helps to accelerate the rapid dispersion of free enterprises through new means of communication and improved mobility. interchange liberalizationAs a way to regulate their international economical position, trade policies has been used by various governments to control what goes in (imports) and out (exports) of the country. Most of the restrictive policies are for imports with the use of barriers such as tari ffs1and non-tariff barriers2, whilst for exports, it run away to be stimulatory (Dicken, 2007). One of the key features and drivers of globalisation has been the liberalization of barriers on trade in goods and services. An consequential motivation for such action is usually relate with market memory access, as many governments reciprocate each former(a)s liberalization decision, each can benefit from the market access provided for its export industries by the other reciprocating government (Hillman et al. 1995). For example, since major reforms to liberalize market since the 1978 and trade, chinaware experienced some of the highest GDP growth ( round 10%) in the world for decades where millions were lifted out of poverty.Although there has been a general shift towards trade liberalization around the world, countries still have differing policies and levels of liberalization depending on arranges of development, culture and other policy-making factors. One prominent internat ional organization that promotes trade liberalization and brought major reductions in trade barriers is the World foxiness Organization3(WTO), which has the competencies to both administer existing trade agreement and to pursue new possibilities of liberalization (WTO, 1995). prejudiced trading agreement can also take place between countries, such as the European Union (EU) and the North American discharge Trade Agreement (NAFTA), where members have a common foreign trade policy and substantially reduce internal trade barriers among themselves (Hillman, 2008). Also, though international trade is getting more liberalized, it has not produced similar level of benefit to all countries. For example, the influx of cheap, subsidized agriculture goods from western countries into poorer developing countries in the south after market liberalization, have devastated many local producers and increase in poverty, as it was the case for the Mexican corn famers4.Differences in cost between co untriesAs a number of factors such as stage of development, location and demography varies between countries, the cost of factors of production land, capital and labour, will undoubtedly differ as well. These differences also increase international trade and investment, thus further driving globalisation. For example, in the southern city of Guangzhou, China, 10,000 labourers work legal hours stitching shoes for Nike at $95 a calendar calendar month (Time, 2004). Therefore, it gives great incentive for companies such as Nike to outsource manufacturing work to China and other low cost economies, where goods can be made at a fraction of the cost as opposed to industrialized countries.As seen in the clothing industries, much of manufacturing has moved to the developing world, where there are small barriers to entry, labour intensive and l hotshotsome(prenominal) requires low levels of economic development in the host country. Also, low cost labour does not tho apply to low skilled wo rks, a highly skilled superior in emerging economies can still be much cheaper to prosecute compared to ones in developed countries while producing similar quality of result. For example, the Intel Centrino Duo industrious platform was almost all developed in Intels India development focus5. When the wages increase as the economy grows, production may be moved to another low cost economy. Of course, the variation in cost is not unique only in human capital, entirely also in many other areas such as raw materials, which can be influence by geographic location of the country. The cost advantage from outsourcing and importing can be negated by shipping and distribution cost, but when the difference is high enough, as it was shown in the huge variation in salaries between China and US it will still be cheaper to import.speedy change in technologyTechnological advancement in the past few decades have led to major improvements to global connectivity (Wellman et al, 2005), mobility an d communication, which in uprise helped to facilitate, drive and be driven by globalisation. Examples of technology change facilitating globalisation can be seen in all sectors, from agricultural, production lines, to finance.In particular, one of the most prevalent changes is in information technology, ranging from expeditious phones to the internet, where people are able to connect to each other from different localities throughout the world and access all sorts of information (Nyiri, 2005). It is based upon the convergence of communications and ready reckoner technologies, shifting from analogue to digital corpses. For example, a director in the US can conduct a meeting with managers based in India through video conferencing, saving time and money from such long remoteness travel. For instance, the Bank of America Corp has 400 video-conferencing systems, and the Cleveland banking company saves $200,000 a month in travel expense by using video conferencing harmonise to one o f its spokesperson (Bills, 2006). Although there are concerns of a digital landmark between places that are connected and those that not, the recent development in mobile technology can help to overcome obstacles in communication access growth in poor countries that lack fixed line infrastructures.In another area, innovations in transferral technologies have accelerated geographical mobility, as speed and efficiency of transportation are dramatically lowered. For instance, development in aviation technology from propeller aircraft in the 1950s to jet passenger aircraft by 1960s has cut travelling time by hours, resulting in greater convenience and international mobility. Overall advances in both transportation and communications technologies have made todays complex global economic system possible by overcome the frictions of space and time.ConclusionThis essay has only covered some of the crucial drivers in the recent globalisation there are a number of other drivers and conditi ons which make globalisation as it is today. Furthermore, each driver has their limitations to the extent of their influence. In the event of the recent global recession, globalisation has come under much criticism as economic shocks can be felt across the globe and affect many people due to the growing interconnection between countries. However, although closing an economy may insulate it from shocks, it can also mean stagnation in growth and even more severe internal crises. Hence, it is also important to remember that most, if not all drivers are dependent on one another, and that the way they are managed will have profound influence on the direction and success of the recent wave of globalisation.ReferencesBannock G., Baxter R. E. and Davis E. (2003) Dictionary of Economics, 7th ed. Penguin Reference, pp. 161Bills S. (2006) image Conferencing Gets Lift from New Technology, American Banker, The Financial Services Daily. Wed. Feb 15, 2006Dicken P. (2007) Global qualify Mapping t he Changing Contours of the World Economy, 5th Ed, Sage Publications, LondonHillman A. (2008)Trade loosening and globalization, Readings in Public Choice and Constitutional Political Economy, Chapter 27. Springer USHillman A.L., Long N.V. and Moser P. (1995) Modeling reciprocal trade liberalization the political-economy and national-welfare perspectives. Swiss journal of Economics and Statistics, 131, pp503-515Joshi R. M. (2009) International Business, Oxford University Press, New Delhi and New York.Keohane R. O. and Nye J. S. Jr. (2000) Introduction. In Joseph S. Nye, Jr and tail D. Donahue (Eds), Governance in a Global World, pp. 1-41. Washington, D.C. Brookings Institution PressLevitt T. (1983) The Globalization of Markets, Harvard Business Review, May/June 1983 39-49Nyiri K. (2005) A Sense of Place. The Global and the Local in Mobile Communication. Wien Passagen Verlag.Parker B. (2005) Introduction to Globalization Business, SAGE Publication, pp. 6-9Time magazine. (2004) How Nike Figured out China, by Matthew Forney, Sunday, Oct 17, 2004. Weblink http//www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,725113-4,00.htmlWellman B. et al. (2005) Connected Lives The Project. The Network Neighbourhood, emended by P. Purcell. Berlin SpringerWorld Trade Organization (1995) International Trade Tends and Statistics (Geneva WTO).