Juvenile Justice

Vineet Advani Mrs. Sheaffer English 7 4 December 2011 Should new-mades Be try As Adults Unmoved by his mothers description of him as a kind and gentle soul, a Harris County control panel come to a decision on Wednesday that 18-year-old, Robert Acuna, should be put on a c beer with kayoed news curse for murdering devil elderly neighbors in a quiet town. Prose geldors presented little elucidation for why the superior High School junior, who pass awayed part time at a fast-food restaurant, shot James Carroll, 75, and his wife, Joyce, 74, execution style. He has evil in his heart, Assistant District Attorney Renee M erae told jurors as she urged them to return a death sentence (film). Acuna was 17 at the time of the murders. The U. S. Supreme Court plans to consider easyr this year whether it is constitutional to carry killers who were younger than 18 when they committed their criminal offences. The grow of 18 brings about freedom for young people in America. At 18, an indivi dual leg in ally becomes an self-aggrandising. An individual toilet now buy cig atomic image 18ttes or a home, enter openhanded- completely clubs, vote, and even nark married.Further more than, from their eighteenth birthday and beyond, individuals argon no longer tried for aversions in new-fashioned accosts. Now, they argon tried in adult courts. But, does genius or two years curb such(prenominal) a difference between sixerteen year olds and eighteen year olds? Is it fair for one person, just seventeen years of age, to be tried in a new-fangled court, receiving a lesser sentence for murder than an individual just six months older or more in age who committed the analogous crime? I think not. some(prenominal) words like Kids are Kids Until They Commit discourtesys by Marjie Lundstrom, Supreme Court to Rule on Executing Young Killers by Adam Liptak, Startling Finds on striplingage Brains by Paul Thompson and Many Kids Called Unfit for Adult Trial by Greg Krikorian show variant views on this topic. But, I think arduous freshs as adults should be consistently allowed because freshs are mature enough to that murder is wrong it reduces crime having consequences harsher for fantastic crimes in teen defend as preclusion to the younker and trying new-fangleds as adults allows society to hold a simple messageMaturity ought to determine culpability, not numerical age. While it is true that juvenile persons, as a group, are less mature and slower wizard development order and thus, level of maturity varies greatly from individual to individual. According Dr. Moin, Assistant Professor of integrity at the University of Alberta, Simply because the average spring chicken is less mature than the average adult does not blind drunk that the particular juvenile who commits a heinous crime is less culpable. There may be really mature and calculating youth and very immature and naive adults. Furthermore, Dr.Brian Woo of Pepperdine University L aw School verbalizes that, earlier than consider juveniles as a class in the aggregate, age alone stubnot be substituted as a measure of an individuals maturity or mental development. Rather than adopt a b advanced roue rule, the Court should allow the jury to component part in any mitigating evidence, i. e. , youth or immaturity, when determining an conquer sentence. Thus, trying juveniles as adults allows culpability to determine the degree and severity of penalization rather than whether or not an individual committed a crime the day before or the day after their 18th birthday.Punishment is expressive and s destroys a clear message against crime. nerve-racking juveniles as adults gives society the ability to express the moral outrage of certain acts. According to David Gelenter of Yale University, we execute murderers in order to make a common proclamation that murder is intolerable. A deliberate murderer embodies evil so terrible that it defiles the corporation. Thus the late loving philosopher Robert Nisbet Until a catharsis has been affected by trial, through the fixing of guilt and then punishment, the federation is anxious, fearful, apprehensive, and above all, contaminated. Individual citizens curb a right and sometimes a duty to speak. A community has the right, too, and sometimes the duty. The community certifies births and deaths, creates marriages, educates children, and fights invaders. In laws, deeds, and ceremonies it lays down the boundary lines of civilized life, lines that are constantly getting scuffed and claiming renewal. Thus, trying juveniles as adults allows society to express a simple message certain acts are simply intolerable. Trying new-fashioneds as adults reduces crime.It is a simple law of economics that by increasing the cost of certain activities, individuals are less believably to engage in those activities. Dr. Moin states that in a view by Dr. Levitt there was a statistically significant negative rel ationship between crime rates of juvenile wrongdoers and length of sentencing. Dr. Moin goes on to state that What these studies show is that juveniles do respond to defend rates and punishment, especially for violent crimes, and that they respond at least as much to punishment as adults do. Thus, trying juveniles as adults reduces crime by deterring others and preventing those convincible to crime from having the ability to do so. news are more likely to be raped in the Juvenile nicety System. Rather than protecting juvenile wrongdoers, the juvenile legal expert clay endangers them far greater than the adult system. According to David Kaiser Across the country, 12. 1% of kids questioned in the Bureau of Justice Statistics survey said that theyd been exciteually mistreated at their current facility during the preceding year. Thats nearly one in eight.In total, according to the almost youthful selective information, there are nearly 93,000 kids in juvenile detention on a ny addicted day we can say confidently that the BJSs 3,220 figure represents only a small fraction of the children informally abused in detention every year. The reason for this epidemic is clear. According to David Kaiser, Adults who want to ingest stimulate with children sometimes look for jobs that will make it easy. They want authority over kids, but no exhausting supervision they alike want positions that will make them seem more trustworthy than their potential accusers. In a sense, juvenile detention facilities are like flashing neon uncloudeds for potential pedophiles. This is by no means rehabilitative. Having consequences harsher for violent crimes in juvenile acts as an avoidance to the youth. The prevention theory states that if the consequence of committing a crime outweighs the benefit of the crime itself, the individual will be deterred from committing the crime. Professor of law Scot and professor of psychological science Steinberg said first, the threat of h arsh sanctions may deter future crime generally by reject youths from ever getting involved in criminal activity. southond, chains prevents crime by incapacitating offenders. Third, imprisonment could reduce future crime by rehabilitating young offenders so that they will mend their criminal slipway Champion and Mays, Criminal Justice Professors at California offer University said Deterrence presumes that punishing an offender will prevent him or her from committing further acts of deviance, or will dissuade others from law-violating behavior, and the transfer of juveniles to adult court should serve a deterrent function.The adult criminal justice system has a worse punishment than the juvenile court therefore it will serve as a better deterrent factor to stop the juvenile violent crime. Effective deterrence will be able to ensure guard duty because it will stop the crime before it happens. When the consequences are worse, there will be less crime therefore Juveniles should be treated as adults in the criminal justice system if they committed a violent crime. Others might say juveniles brains arent as veritable as adults.However, you are taught to manage what is right and wrong so how does your brain universe not fully developed affect your energy of knowing that murder is wrong. According to Terence T. Gorski is an internationally gaind expert on substance abuse, mental health, violence, & crime and others qualified professionals, (Ed. Judy Layzell. Ortiz, Adam. ) Scientific studies crap determined that the human brain undergoes continuous development up to the age of about twenty-one. Because the brains of juveniles, particularly the frontal lobes, are not fully developed, youths lack the ability to perform full of life adult functions, such as plan, anticipate consequences, and control impulses, states Adam Ortiz, a policy fellow with the American Bar Association Juvenile Justice Center. Although juveniles should be punished for their crimes, th ey are not as obligated as adults. This is the premise beneath societys across-the-board restrictions on voting rights, alcohol and tobacco consumption, and serving in the armed forces, observes Ortiz. Indeed, this is why we refer to those under 18 as minors and juvenilesbecause, in so numerous an(prenominal) respects, they are less than adult. dispatch however is a different story since you end someones life. As I said, Juveniles are TAUGHT to know what is wrong and right. The mentality of the newer contemporariess is generally high than the children from 30 years ago. Murder is wrong and if juveniles know its wrong and still commits murder, why should we still go easy on them and treat them as juveniles?In summary, trying juveniles as adults is justified by both deontological and practical views of justice by ensuring culpability is the standard of punishment all the patch deterring crime and protecting juveniles from abuse. From writing this essay, I make up learned that if I was a lawyer and I was against a juvenile in adult court, I would treat him like any other criminal because of the severity of their crime not the perpetuators age. Even though the juveniles are under 18, they still hire learned that murder is wrong and I will treat them as if they know that murder is wrong because it is a idea everyone knows.Work cited summon Film When Kids Get Life. Ofra Bikel. Dir. Nathan Ybanez, Erik Jenson, Trever Jones. Andrew Medina. Perf. PBS. 2007. film Articles Thompson, Paul. Startling Finds on Teenage Brains. Sacramento Bee Sacramento, CA 25 May 2001. Pg 1-2 Krikorian, Greg. Many Kids Called Unfit For Trial. The Sacramento Bee Sacramento, CA 3 Mar. 2003 1-2. Print. Liptak, Adam. Supreme Court to Rule on Executing Young Killers. The revolutionary York Times New York City, NY 3 Jan. 2005 1-2. Print. Lundstorm, Marjie. Kids Are Kids-Until They Commit Crimes. The Sacramento Bee Sacramento, CA 1 Mar. 2001 1-2. Print.Juvenile JusticeAccording to t he name Many Kids Called Unfit for Adult Trial, 200,000 juveniles a year are being tried as adults in the United States. They are sentenced to life in prison and even the death penalty. But is that what is really outdo for them? Putting these teenagers in prison for life gives them no materialize to change their lives around and learn from what theyve done. I strongly believe that adolescents should not be sentences as adults but still deserve a commodious punishment. Teenagers should not be tried as adults because teenagers brains are not fully developed as adult brains are.In his article Startling Finds on Teenage Brains, Paul Thompson states, The biggest surprise in recent teen-brain explore is the finding that a massive loss of brain tissue occurs in the teen years. How are these teens supposed to understand what they are doing if they are not fully mature and arent mentally enduring? Thompson too says that, Brain cells and connections are only being lost in the areas co ntrolling impulses, pretend-taking, and self-control. These children are not aware of how effective their actions are and therefore, should be overhauled immediately.These kids who are being tries as adults are not mentally capable of defending themselves. According to Laurence Steinberg, a Temple University psychology professor, It is a violation of constitutional right to be a defendant in a criminal proceeding when you are not effective to defend yourself. These juveniles being tried as adults do not understand the proceedings. They dont recognize the risks in different choices and are less likely to think about long term consequences. For example, Robert Acuna, a high cultivate student from Baytown, Texas, was given the death sentence for killing two elderly neighbors.In the article Supreme Court to Rule on Executing Young Killer, Ms. Magee said, He was very nonchalant. He laughed at inappropriate things. He still didnt quite get the magnitude of everything he did. There are umpteen other teens like Robert who dont think before their actions. Acuna may have killed his two elderly neighbors and stolen their car, but his punishment should not have been death. I dont think that anyone should have the power to decide who should live or die, not matter what they have done. The judge who decides this and the executor who killed these kids should not be alive anymore than Robert Acuna is.Taking these kids lives away or putting them in prison for life gives them no chance to change their lives around. I highly doubt that they will learn a lesson in prison. Even though I dont think kids should be tries as adults, they still need some tell apart of punishment. As Paul Thompson said, While research on brain tissue loss can assistant us to understand teens better, it cannot be used to excuse their violent or homicidal behavior. But it can be used as evidence that teenagers are not yet adults and the legal system shouldnt treat them as such. They could stay in jail with other teens but not for life. I besides think that they need help from a therapist or psychiatrist. They are seriously impaired and need help to steer their lives in the right direction. Prison is a negative surround and will only make them worse and helping hander to more problems such as fights and violence. These juveniles are kids They dont have the selfsame(prenominal) rights as adults. They arent allowed to drink, smoke, vote, get married, etc. They are not ready to take track of themselves or live on their own. In the article Kids are Kids-Until They Commit Crimes, a Democratic State Rep.Ron Wilson of Houston said, You want to throw the adult book at kids? Fine Lower the voting age to fourteen. I agree with Wilson. Kids arent allowed to vote because they arent mature and for the same reason, they should not be tried as adults. Even though these kids have made huge mistakes, I think they deserve a hour chance in life. They shouldnt be tried as adults nor b e sentenced to die. This doesnt mean that they get away with the crimes theyve committed, it just means they wont be in prison their whole life for a crime they committed when they were kids.Juvenile Justice discussion vs. Punishment There are many different types of crimes committed by juvenile delinquents in todays society. These crimes consist of violent crimes, belongings crimes, forgery, fraud, vandalism as easy as many others. In 2009, there were 32,638,900 youths in the United States and 1,906,600 of them were arrested for a type of crime. (Puzzanchera & Adams, 2012). There are many options that the Department of Juvenile Justice System can lead towards such as punishment or hitch, but the replenishment depends on the juvenile at hand.Most research suggests there is a reduced recidivism amongst juveniles who receive intercession. Treatment options are the i give out way to deal with juvenile delinquency. Juvenile Delinquency The definition of juvenile delinquency is a behavior against the criminal code, committed by an individual who has not reached proper adulthood by state or federal law. (Bartol & Bartol, 2011). Different states have different age of jurisdictions ranging from ages 15 through 17 which 37 states have adopted. The age of the youth dictates whether the juvenile court or the adult court system has authority over the case. (Listwan, 2013, reciprocal ohm 1. 2). For instance, if a juvenile committed a crime in clams at the age of 17 the jurisdiction would be in adult court system. Treatment and Punishment Concepts There is a debate on whether juvenile delinquents should be punished for their crimes, or if they should be rehabilitated for the crimes they committed. When many people look at the court system they may believe that the juvenile justice system is geared towards punishment but in the past, the juvenile justice system was geared towards rehabilitation. Historically, the juvenile justice system was oriented toward rehabili tation and care of the youth. (Listwan, 2013, Sec 1. 3). In recent years, society is getting back to rehabilitation concepts by incorporating different treatment options whereas in the 1970s a psychologist by the name of Robert Martinson did a study on whether or not treatment reduced recidivism rates. In his study, Martinson concluded that treatment did not lead to lower recidivism rates and stated, Nothing whole works when it came to treatment. (Listwan, 2013).Currently in the midst of juvenile delinquency, research is showing that treatment services are working by as much as 3035 percent. (Listwan, 2013). In Australia, a study was conducted on recidivism rates for juvenile offenders and they reported that 1,500 juvenile justice clients reoffended, which was a 61 percent increase. (Day, Ho salubriouss & Rickwood, 2004). They were astonished by this figure and began to implement rehabilitation known as a what works approach to offenders. This approach can be summarized by a core set of principles of human service delivery.Collectively, these principles suggest that reductions in recidivism can be maximized when programs select appropriate candidates, target factors that directly relate to their offending, and are delivered in ways that facilitate learning. (Day, Howells & Rickwood, 2004, conservation of parity 5). This program appears to be working at the recidivism rates are change magnitude. The United States is also implementing rehabilitation programs to help reduce recidivism rates. More than 30 years of research has produced a body of evidence that clearly demonstrates that rehabilitation programs work. (Przybylski, 2008, Pg 2). Juvenile Sex Offenders and Juvenile Justice Intervention Strategy A juvenile sex offender is described as a youth who has been convicted of a sex crime which may include rape, sodomy, fondling, or other forced sexual act. (Listwan, 2013). Numerous people believe that society should throw away the learn on these juvenile s ex offenders. Sex offenders are often placed on the lowest troll of the criminal hierarchy meaning that most people feel that sex offenders are the worst of the worst. (Listwan, 2013, Sec 9. 4).In some cases, if a child does not receive the proper counseling needed, they can grow up committing the same acts of violence which were bestowed on them. For instance, violence becomes a learned problem-solving technique transmitted from one generation to the next in a phenomenon known as the cycle of violence. (Collica & Furst, 2012, Sec 7. 1). If a youth does end up committing this act of violence, they are first adjudicated by the court system and will receive their sentencing. A judge will either come out them to a treatment facility or else may send them to a detention center depending on the age of the juvenile.All judges seem to believe that family structure and antecedent record are almost equally important factors in determining offenders likelihood of rehabilitation. (DAngelo , 2010). There are many treatment facilities which deal special(prenominal)ally with juvenile sex offenders. Psychologists are becoming more affirmative in the treatment of sex offenders. First, they believe that the most effective interventions, or treatment methods, are those that stick to the principles of risk, need, and responsivity (RNR). (Bartol & Bartol, 2011, Pg 403).Other treatment which appears to be successful is cognitive behavioural therapy which shapes the behavior as well as intellection pattern in offenders. This therapy teaches juveniles on their thinking pattern on some situation and how that can ascertain their actions in some situations. Cognitive behavior therapy argues that maladaptive sexual behaviors are learned according to the same rules as normal sexual behavior, by means of classical and/or instrumental conditioning, modeling, reinforcement, generalization, and punishment. (Bartol & Bartol, 2011, Pg 404).A great deal of studies suggests that cognit ive behavior therapy appears to be the best treatment in reducing recidivism amongst juvenile delinquents whether this include sexual offences or any other type of offences. Juveniles who complete a cognitive-behavioral program are less likely to commit sexual or any re-offenses than are juveniles who do not receive treatment, receive an resource treatment, or do not complete treatment. (Przybylski, 2008, Pg 53). Multisystemic therapy (MST) is also a successful treatment approach for serious juvenile offenders.This therapy option addresses the cognitive and systemic factors such as family, peers, as well as school which are associated with risk factors. The juvenile, counselor as well as the family work together. In a study conducted, The data showed that MST participants had significantly lower recidivism rates at follow-up than did those participants who received individual therapy (50% vs. 81%, respectively). Recidivism, depending on the study, refers to re-arrest, reconviction, or incarceration after an initial juvenile arrest, conviction, or incarceration. (Bartol & Bartol, 2011, Pg 168). In North Carolina, there is a successful intervention program called Sexual Abuse Intervention Services. This program is located at atomic number 56 Spring. This program offers, This program offers, psychosexual evaluation (Sex Offense Specific Evaluation), in-home family therapy, weekly sex offense particular group therapy, individual therapy, individualized safety plans in the home, school and community, case counselingcoordinating and supervise services, ongoing consultation with juvenile court counselors to monitor clients reatment progress and status in the home/community, family reunification when appropriate, step-down services for clients who are transitioning back into the community from residential placement. (Foster, 2013). This program believes in treating juvenile sex offenders to reduce recidivism. The program appears to be successful for the fact that many juvenile sex offender clients at a local group home attended this program and none of them have reoffended. Unfortunately, there is no data available.Juvenile Crime Statistics Different states have different statistics on juvenile offenders. In 2009, 1,906,600 juveniles were arrested for various types of crimes in the United States. During that year, there were 722,000 youths in Arizona, 1,096,000 in Michigan, and 971,900 youths in North Carolina. (Puzzanchera, Adams, & Kang, 2012). In that same year, Arizona had 52,062 juveniles arrested for various crimes Michigan had 36,643 juvenile arrested and North Carolina had 48,634 for various crimes.Statistics indicate that in Arizona, 1,366 juveniles were arrested for violent crimes including rape, robbery and aggravated assault and 11,181 were arrested for position crimes including burglary, larceny, motor vehicle theft, arson as well as many others. In Michigan there were 2,136 juveniles arrested for violent crimes and 10,993 we re arrested for property crimes. North Carolina statistics show that 2,483 juveniles were arrested for violent crimes and 12,766 were arrested for property crime. (Puzzanchera, Adams, & Kang, 2012).The arrest rate in juveniles has steadily decreased from the 1990s through present time in Arizona, Michigan and North Carolina. Society would agree that this decrease in crime is beneficial to every person in the community. Arizona, Michigan and North Carolina juvenile arrests consist of every race including sporting, Black, Indian, Asian, Hispanic, as well as many others. Not one particular race committed any acts of violence, but instead all races. For instance, in Arizona, 10,259 White juveniles committed violent crimes and 34,070 committed property crimes. ,465 Black juveniles committed violent crimes and 3,191 committed property crimes including drug charges. 5,016 Hispanic juveniles committed violent crimes and 15,388 committed property crimes. (Halliday, 2011). In Michigan, viole nt crime data indicates that nine Black juveniles committed murders and one White committed murder. 476 black juveniles were arrested for aggravated assault, 418 arrests for White juveniles, and 12 arrests of Hispanic juveniles. (Elam, Siemon & Fitzpatrick, 2012).As for robbery in Michigan, 384 were Black juveniles, whereas 39 were White and six were Hispanic juveniles. Property crimes such as larceny show that 3,131 arrests were White juveniles, 2,241 arrests were Black juveniles and 151 were Hispanic juveniles. (Elam, Siemon & Fitzpatrick, 2012). For burglary crimes, there were 630 arrests of White juveniles, 651 arrests of Black juveniles and 29 arrests of Hispanic juveniles. In North Carolina, the statistics are different than Arizona as well as Michigan. The state of North Carolina analyzes their data according to class felonies.For instance, in 2009 the juvenile arrest rate for Black juveniles with a class A-E felony which includes, murder, rape, sexual assault, manslaughter, drug crimes, sexual battery, robbery as well as others was 485 juveniles. (NCDJJ, 2010). There were 226 White juveniles convicted of a class A-E felony and 28 Hispanic. In the class F-I felony which includes property crimes, the data indicated 4,816 Black juveniles were arrested, 2,837 White juveniles were arrested as well as 1,670 Hispanics were arrested. (NCDJJ, 2010).Males along with females both account for crimes committed on adult as well as juvenile levels. Numerous people believe that males make up arrest statistics, but females guide to these arrests. For instance, in the state of Arizona, 16,943 females were arrested in 2009. 34,659 juvenile males were arrested that same year. The female juveniles accounted for 4,611 violent crimes and 12,332 property crimes. 7,804 arrests were made for violent crimes amongst males and 26, 855 for property crimes. (Halliday, 2011).In Michigan, juvenile females accounted for 6,484 arrests in 2009. Male arrest rates were much high at 14,81 4. (Elam, Siemon & Fitzpatrick, 2012). The number of arrests statewide decreased for both male and female juveniles between 2005 and 2009, with violent crimes by females decreasing more slightly than violent crimes by males. (Elam, Siemon & Fitzpatrick, 2012, Pg 43). In 2009, there were 2,734 juvenile females arrested for larceny theft as well as 2,894 juvenile males arrested for larceny theft.Unfortunately, there was no data available for juvenile gender arrests overlook that all arrests made were 75% male juveniles. (NCDJJ, 2010). Different states have different age ranges on who commits an act of violence. Unfortunately, not all states have data on the age ranges for youths such as Arizona. In Michigan, for instance, 86 percent of arrests for sex offences were between the ages of 13 through 16. (Elam, Siemon & Fitzpatrick, 2012). In 2009, juveniles between the age of seven through 10, 276 were arrested which represented 1. percent of total arrests that year. (Elam, Siemon & Fit zpatrick, 2012). In North Carolina, 3. 11 undisciplined rates per 1,000 between the ages of six to 17 were arrested. The delinquent Rate per 1,000 between the ages of six to 15 was 29. 14 in 2009. (NCDJJ, 2010). State Treatment Every state has different treatment options for juveniles. Most states offer teen courts for juvenile delinquents. For instance, in Arizona, Teen Court hears the matter and determines an appropriate, constructive consequence, using established guidelines. (Starky, 2012). These constructive consequences range from community service hours, restitution, a letter of apology, counseling, tutoring, research papers, educational classes, skill-building classes, as well as a few others. Arizona also offers early intervention programs such as Court Unified Truancy Suppression Program, Families in deprivation of Services, Drug Diversion Program, as well as School Safety Program. The state of Michigan also tries early intervention as well as treatment programs for their juvenile delinquents.For instance, Michigan currently has iii rehabilitation facilities which focus on therapy as well as specialized treatment programs. Unfortunately, Michigan cut their budget on treatment facilities from 2000 which had approximately 10 facilities. This state offers early intervention programs one in particular called Juvenile Accountability Block Grants JABG program. This programs mission is to Reduce juvenile offending through accountability-based programs focus on juvenile offenders and the juvenile justice system. (DHS, 2013).North Carolina also prefers treatment instead of punishment. The Division offers services for youth by establishing and maintaining a seamless comprehensive juvenile justice system that promotes juvenile delinquency prevention, intervention and treatment. (NCDPS, 2012). North Carolina juvenile justice system focuses to strengthen families, promote delinquency prevention, support core cordial institutions, intervene immediately and e ffectively when delinquent behavior occurs and identify and control the small group of serious, violent, and chronic juvenile offenders in the local communities. NCDPS, 2012). North Carolina offers many facilities for juveniles around the state and a great deal of these facilities includes crime specific treatment. When juveniles are adjudicated and once they are dropd they may continue on the same form and commit other crimes. Often times, juveniles will continue with this circle and end up back in juvenile detention centers or on probation. The Arizona Department of Juvenile corrections had a 12 month recidivism rate of 34. 1percent for juveniles released during 2008.The number dropped from 2006 which indicated there was a 48 percent recidivism rate. (ADJC, 2010). In Michigan, the recidivism rate calculated by a felony conviction was 22 percent at two years after release during 2004. The number dropped from the previous year at 24 percent. Recidivism rates were higher for mino rity youths than for white youths. (MDHS, 2013). In 2004 in North Carolina, the recidivism rate for juvenile delinquents was 26. 7 percent. (Beck, Calhoun, Hevener & Katzenelson, 2007). Arizona appears to have the highest recidivism rate in all three states. TheoriesThere is no exact evidence which addresses juvenile delinquency but a mixture of biological, psychological and sociological. The biological theory explains that physical attributes as well as heredity may lead a juvenile to commit crimes. Biological explanations of behavior focus on biological properties of an individual, including the individuals genetic background, structural violate in the brain, or the role of various chemicals in the nervous system. (Wilson, 2012, Sec 1. 5). Heredity also exercises a major role in behavior and criminal actions are believed to have run down in the family. Hereditary explanations of causation hold that criminality in some families is hereditary, and that deviance is genetically en coded in those innate(p) into the family group. (Martin, 2005, Pg 76). Research believes that hormones may have an wedge on people committing crimes such as higher testosterone. Studies find that men with high levels of testosterone are more likely to be aggressive. More importantly, studies find that hormones can impact the brain, making individuals less sensitive to stimuli, so they in turn seek out more stir situations to stimulate their brain. (Listwan, 2013, Sec 3. 4). Another indicator could include the environment the juvenile resides. Environment can play a crucial role such a brain development, depression, anxiety, aggression as well as hyperactivity. Numerous people believe that the environment plays a significant role on behavior which can be stemmed from parents raising their children. Criminals and delinquents are stimulated (reinforced) by their environment to continue acting out defiantly until they are punished in some manner. (Martin, 2005, Pg 81).With this bein g said, when a juvenile is rewarded for their deviance, and receive no punishment or treatment for breaking the law, they will continue to do so until they are adjudicated. psychological theory which is also the personality theory suggests that there is a relationship between crime and personality. Juvenile delinquents and adult criminals are, according to psychoanalytic theory, persons without sufficiently developed egos and superegos. If the moralistic superego is weak, a person can easily act out on his or her primal urges without remorse (an unchecked id), and mislabel deviance as pleasing behavior. (Martin, 2005, Pg 80). Another theory under the psychological theory is the conditioning theory. This portion explains that a persons future behavior is conditioned by his or her past experiences. The interrelationships between individuals, socioeconomic groups, social processes, and social structures are known as the sociological theory. It is believes that a lower living class ha s a higher crime rate. The UCR shows that there is a class crime relationship, meaning crime rates are higher among those who are lower in class areas. (Listwan, 2013, Sec 3. 5). For instance, in many lower class areas, parents work to support their family, thus in return youths do not have any supervision. The youths in light of the freedom, tend to get into trouble. For instance, in Gladwin County in Michigan indicates this is the one of Michigans counties with the highest number of juvenile poverty rate which is over 29 percent. This county also has the states highest juvenile arrest rate. With this being said, socioeconomic considerations have an impact on the influences in juvenile delinquency.Treatment There are many treatment options for juveniles which have become promptly available. The best type of treatment option would be early intervention. Youths should arrest young in learning to control their behavior as well as take office for their actions. Numerous people will look at juvenile delinquents and give up on their treatment. They may think that he or she is past the point of rehabilitation. A beneficial program that parents should incorporate in their daily lives is called the Incredible Years Series (IYS) Program.This program not only works for children who display behavioral or conduct disorders, but also for other children. This program is geared towards children between the ages of two through ten. The Incredible Years nurtures, Teachers, and Children Training Series, is designed to prevent, reduce, and treat conduct problems among children ages 2 to 10 and to increase their social competence. (Wilson, 2000, Pg 1). Some goals to reduce conduct problems in children include decreasing negative behaviors and noncompliance with parents at home, decreasing peer aggression and disruptive behaviors in the classroom.Other goals include promoting social, emotional, and academic competence in children such as increasing childrens social skills, in creasing childrens understanding of feelings, increasing childrens conflict management skills and decrease negative attributions, as well as increasing academic engagement, school readiness, and cooperation with teachers. A developed body of research has clearly shown that young children with early-onset behavioral problems are at significantly greater risk of having severe antisocial difficulties, academic underachievement, school dropout, violence, and drug abuse in adolescence and adulthood. (Webster-Stratton & Herman, 2010). With this program, all children can have a crime free future. Conclusion In conclusion, treatment options are the ideal way to deal with juvenile delinquency. There are many attributes which take place in dealing with punishment or treatment for juvenile offenders. Most research suggests that treatment is the best options and helps reduce recidivism rate. For juvenile sex offenders, specific treatment helps reduce the likelihood of recidivism especially wit h cognitive behavior therapy.There are also numerous programs such as the one in North Carolina which deals directly with juvenile sex offenders. The program has a considerably turn around rate with the local group home facility. Every state has different data, and while comparing this data opens a persons eyes as to the crime rate in their community. When people observe this data it gives them an incentive to get out in the community and help these juvenile delinquents. Even though Arizona has the least amount of juvenile arrests, this state has the highest recidivism rate amongst Arizona, Michigan as well as North Carolina.When trying to pin point on why a juvenile acts out, biological, psychological and sociological theories all play a major role. The reasoning can be from heredity, personality, environment as well as socioeconomic considerations. There are many early intervention programs readily available for youths as well as juvenile delinquents which have already committed a crime. Parent should begin to take an initiative in their children life at an early age to stop the deviant behavior in the future. After all, these children are our future. References Alexander, M. A. (1999).Sexual offender treatment efficacy revisited. Sexual Abuse diary OfResearch And Treatment, 11(2), 101-116. doi10. 1007/BF02658841. Retrieved fromEBSCOhost Database. Bartol, C. R. , & Bartol, A. M. (2011). Criminal behavior A pscychological approach (9th ed. ). Upper Saddle River Pearson Education, Inc. ISBN 9780558591373 Beck, M. , Calhoun, K. , Hevener, G. , & Katzenelson, S. (2007). Juvenile recidivism study. DOI www. nccourts. org/Courts/CRS/Councils/spac/Documents Collica, K. & Furst, G. (2012). Crime & society. San Diego, CA Bridgepoint Education, Inc.Retrieved from Ashford Constellation. DAngelo, J. M. (2002). Juvenile court judges perceptions of what factors affect juvenileoffenders likelihood of rehabilitation. Juvenile & Family Court Journal, 53(3), 43-55. Retrieved from ProQuest Database. Day, A. , Howells, K. , & Rickwood, D. (2004). Current trends in the rehabilitation of juvenileoffenders. Woden, Woden Australian Institute of Criminology. Retrieved from ProQuestDatabase. Elam, P. , Siemon, C. , & Fitzpatrick, D. (2012). Michigans Statewide Juvenile Arrest AnalysisReport. Retrieved from Public http//michigancommitteeonjuvenilejustice. om/sitefiles/files/Documents/2012JuvenileArrestAnalysisReportVol1. pdf Foster, J. (2013). Barium springs, bragging(a) hope to children and families. Retrieved fromhttp//www. bariumsprings. org/page. cfm? id=32 Halliday, R. (2011). Arizona department of public safety. Retrieved fromhttp//www. azdps. gov/About/Reports/docs/Crime_In_Arizona_Report_2009. pdf Listwan, S. J. (2013). Introduction to juvenile justice. San Diego, CA Bridgepoint, Education,Inc. Martin, G. (2005). Juvenile justice. Thousand Oaks, CA SAGE Publications. DOIwww. sagepub. com/books/Book226433 MDHS. (2013).Juvenile accountability block grant s (jabg). Retrieved fromhttp//www. michigan. gov/dhs/0,4562,7-124-5453_34044_34052-15632,00. html NCDJJ. (2010). 2009 annual report jointure carolina department of juvenile justice. Retrievedfrom websitehttp//www. juvjus. state. nc. us/resources/pdf_documents/annual_report_2009. pdf Pullman, L. , & Seto, M. C. (2012). Assessment and treatment of adolescent sexual offendersImplications of recent research on generalist versus specialist explanations. Child Abuse& Neglect, 36(3), 203-209. doi10. 1016/j. chiabu. 2011. 11. 003. Retrieved fromEBSCOhost Database. Puzzanchera, C. nd Adams, B. (2012). Juvenile Arrests 2009. Office of Juvenile Justice andDelinquency Prevention. Retrieved from http//www. ojjdp. gov Starky, C. (2012). Teen courts Juvenile probation. Retrieved fromhttp//www. superiorcourt. maricopa. gov/JuvenileProbation/Probation/teenCourt. asp Wilson, J. F. (2012). Introduction to biological psychology. San Diego, CA BridgepointEducation, Inc. Webster-Stratton, C. , & Herman, K. C. (2010). Disseminating Incredible Years Series earlyintervention programs integrating and sustaining services between school and home. Psychology In The Schools, 47(1), 36-54.